Clinical Decision Support in AI

How Clinical Decision Support AI Can Dramatically Improve Patient Safety

Clinical decision support AI is poised to radically improve patient safety. But that potential hinges on the use of high-quality data. This article explores the key data challenges that must be addressed to fully leverage AI in clinical decision support and minimize harm.

Table of Contents

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds plenty of promise for patient safety. But there’s a catch: To successfully improve patient safety, clinical decision support AI needs to be developed with high-quality, reliable data. If subpar data is used, AI models will not result in the desired patient safety improvements – and, worse yet, could cause significant harm.

Indeed, clinical decision support AI and other AI applications developed with unreliable data could lead to large numbers of patient injuries, according to a study published in Nature Medicine. Conversely, if an individual provider makes a decision based on poor data, the harm is likely to be much more contained. To make matters worse, when using clinical decision support AI, clinicians do not necessarily have the training to identify underlying glitches such as data bias, overfitting, or other software errors that might lead to less-than-optimal patient care. For example, such flaws in AI could result in incorrect medication dosage.

Clinical Decision Support AI

How Clinical Decision Support AI Can Impact Patient Safety

Clinical decision support AI and other AI models are poised to have a significant positive impact on patient safety. According to a literature review published in JMIR Medical Informatics and a study published in the American Journal of Infection Control, when developed and implemented correctly, AI in clinical decision support can enhance patient safety by improving:

Such improvements can elevate patient safety efforts in a variety of domains such as:

  • Healthcare-associated infections
  • Adverse drug events
  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Surgical complications
  • Pressure ulcers
  • Falls
  • Decompensation
  • Diagnostic errors

What’s more, AI can play a role in improving adherence to existing safety protocols. Consider the following: When a machine learning (ML) algorithm was developed to provide real-time hand hygiene alerts based on data from multiple types of sensors, compliance to best practices rose from 54% to 100%, according to a study in the Journal of Hospital Infection Control.

Exploring Data Challenges with Clinical Decision Support AI

While the possibilities are promising, the application of AI and ML to improve patient safety is an emerging field and many algorithms have not yet been externally validated or tested prospectively. Indeed, algorithms may be limited in generalizability, and performance could potentially be affected by the clinical context where the solution is implemented, according to an article in Digital Medicine.

Perhaps most importantly, to achieve optimal results, AI and ML algorithms designed to reduce medical errors and improve patient safety should be developed by accessing intelligence from large databases that contain accurate information on errors.

While access to voluminous data is key, the potential of AI for clinical decision support also hinges on data quality, bias mitigation, and data privacy and security. For example, if an AI model is developed with data that does not represent certain groups, the results of care delivered with the assistance of clinical decision support AI will not be equitable, according to an original research article in Health Policy and Technology. In fact, a systematic review by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center found that algorithms developed on subpar data can exacerbate racial and ethnic disparities, while those developed on high-quality, inclusive data can potentially reduce disparities.

Data privacy and ethical use is another challenge associated with the development and implementation of clinical decision support system AI, according to the World Economic Forum.

How to Ensure Data Quality for Clinical Decision Support AI

To achieve the best clinical care and patient safety results, the quality of data needs to be a top concern as AI is developed and implemented.

To address quality concerns, Oliver Haase, a professor at the University of Applied Sciences in Konstanz, German, recommends the use of a data quality plan that includes the following components:

  1. Key quality metrics for the data
  2. A standard procedure for adding new data
  3. The process for future, consistent data cleaning
  4. A process for continuous data quality monitoring

Likewise, a data manipulation plan that describes the data processing steps should be leveraged. This plan should be implemented as reusable code.

In addition, it is important to ensure that clinical decision support AI model goals are in alignment with specific patient safety goals, such as identifying patient decompensation or improving infection control, according to a perspective article published by AHRQ. If the AI model is not precisely aligned with such patient safety goals, it might either miss critical signs of risk or generate false alarms.

Addressing Common Data Concerns

Researchers and developers also need to mitigate the effects of data bias. To do this, they should routinely analyze model metrics to detect bias, edit input variables, and explore the use of synthetic data, which involves creating artificial data that mimic real patient data but without the inherent biases, according to a review published by AHRQ.

Moreover, data-sharing practices for training and deploying clinical decision support AI must prioritize HIPAA compliance, encryption, and transparency to maintain patient trust and safety.

Because healthcare data contains personal and private patient information, sharing such data for AI model training and research purposes must be carried out with utmost caution and adherence to strict privacy and security measures, according to AHRQ.

Why New Data Could Make Clinical Decision Support AI Even Better

With data available today—especially laboratory information, imaging, and continuous vital sign data—it should be possible to reduce the frequency of many types of harm. However, when the data are available, they are often unstructured, undocumented, or disputed.

High-quality, large, annotated databases will prove quite fruitful in minimizing patient harm in the future. New types of data, especially from the huge array of sensing technologies becoming available, but also including data from various other sources like information supplied directly by patients, genomic sequencing, and social media, offer new opportunities to improve predictions as the first step toward development of preventive interventions to improve safety.

These types of data are becoming more accessible over time for research and to drive innovation in clinical decision support AI.

You may also like:

5 Leaders Share Patient Safety Strategy and Objectives for 2025

As hospitals refine their patient safety strategy for 2025, leaders share proven approaches to reducing readmissions, improving CMS Star Ratings, and optimizing care for high-cost patients. Discover how data-driven strategies and quality improvement initiatives are shaping safer, more efficient hospital care.

Table of Contents

As hospitals continue to face quality and cost pressures in 2025, hospital leaders are prioritizing patient safety objectives to enhance care quality and reduce risks. From readmissions management and CMS Star Ratings to addressing high-cost diagnoses and new structural measures, healthcare quality leaders are striving for a comprehensive patient safety strategy to drive improvements.

That’s what five hospital leaders in quality, compliance, and patient safety shared in recent interviews with American Data Network. While challenges remain, these professionals are moving forward with tools and strategies for quality improvement and patient safety, leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration to achieve results in 2025 and beyond.

Patient Safety Strategy

Patient Safety Strategy #1: Reducing Readmissions Through Proactive Care

Many quality, safety, and compliance leaders continue to focus on reducing hospital readmissions as a core patient safety objective.

“For us, readmissions is one of the big things we’re focusing on, as well as patient satisfaction,” shares Cara Cruz, BA, RN, CIC, CPHQ, Director of Risk and Quality, Patient Safety Officer, and Infection Control Officer at Carson Valley Health. Cruz calls readmission prevention “a real challenge” requiring a multifaceted patient safety strategy.

At Carson Valley, a comprehensive discharge planning process ensures patients have their medications and post-discharge care within two business days. Monthly focus groups analyze readmitted patients, using risk stratification models to guide outreach:

  • Care managers engage low-risk patients.
  • Provider clinics focus on high-risk patients based on diagnosis criteria.

This approach has been “hugely, widely successful,” Cruz says.

However, data access remains a barrier. While internal readmissions are trackable, external readmissions—those occurring at unaffiliated hospitals—are often invisible in the system.

At Unity Health in Arkansas, Timothy Copeland, MT (ASCP), MHA, Director of Quality/Risk Management, emphasizes that optimizing discharge efficiency and reducing readmissions are key priorities for their patient safety strategy in 2025.

Patient Safety Strategy #2: Strengthening Quality and Safety Measures

Facilities are also making a push to meet CMS’ expanding group of structural measures surrounding patient safety. That is going to be a major focus at San Luis Valley Health Regional Medical Center in Alamosa, Colorado, says Margaret White, CPHQ, Director of Quality and Safety at the facility.

White notes new structural measures that CMS finalized in the 2025 Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) final rule that begin during the 2025 reporting year, including the Patient Safety Structural Measure (PSSM) and the Age Friendly Structural Measure. Both of the new measures are linked to 2027 payment determinations.

“CMS is finalizing several new hospital quality initiatives, including digital measures for patient harm events, expansion of healthcare-associated infection measures to oncology wards, and structural measures to support safety and age-friendly care,” the agency said. “The new attestation-based structural measures assess whether hospitals demonstrate a structure, culture, and leadership commitment that prioritizes and implements best practices for patient safety and age-friendly care.”

Each of the new measures has five attestation domains. PSSM domains include:

  • Domain 1: Leadership Commitment to Eliminating Preventable Harm
  • Domain 2: Strategic Planning and Organizational Policy
  • Domain 3: Culture of Safety and Learning Health System
  • Domain 4: Accountability and Transparency
  • Domain 5: Patient and Family Engagement

The Age Friendly Hospital Measure attestation domains cover:

  • Domain 1: Eliciting Patient Healthcare Goals
  • Domain 2: Responsible Medication Management
  • Domain 3: Frailty Screening and Intervention
  • Domain 4: Social Vulnerability
  • Domain 5: Age-Friendly Care Leadership

In the 2025 IPPS rule, CMS also said it would modify two current measures, with one revision affecting facilities in 2025: The agency is changing the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Survey measure beginning in the 2025 reporting year (payment determinations in 2027). The revisions to the HCAHPS Survey add three new survey sub-measures, remove one existing survey sub-measure and revise one existing survey sub-measure, according to CMS.

According to White of San Luis Valley Health, while a lot of national groups are providing education about the new measures, finding an organization or third-party that can help hospitals navigate both of the new measures can be a challenge. “I haven’t found a group that’s focusing on both,” White says.

What’s more, the measures – and the work they entail – can further pinch scarce hospital resources. “It’s hard to find the funds to meet the measures,” White adds.

At Cheyenne Regional Medical Center, hospital leaders are taking a proactive approach to navigating the new measures. “We’re meeting monthly to go over every measure,” says Brianna Best Lima, BA, MA, CPHQ, Manager, Data Management at Cheyenne Regional. That focus aligns with Cheyenne’s “ramping up efforts around value-based care and patient safety,” Lima says.

For hospitals looking to assess and improve their patient safety culture, resources such as the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture provide valuable insights into safety perceptions, reporting behaviors, and areas needing attention.

Patient Safety Strategy #3: Achieving Higher CMS Star Ratings

Publicly reported CMS Star Ratings continue to influence hospital performance initiatives, shaping strategic priorities for 2025 and beyond.

Hospitals with a well-established culture of safety in healthcare tend to excel in CMS safety metrics, as they proactively address risks, implement best practices, and engage staff in continuous quality improvement.

“Our focus is related to publicly reported data and patient experience feedback that doesn’t always make it into reports,” says Copeland of Unity Health.

The CMS Star Ratings system evaluates hospitals across five key domains:

  • Mortality
  • Safety of care
  • Readmission rates
  • Patient experience
  • Timely and effective care

According to CMS data, most hospitals are in the three-star (17.8%) and four-star (16.4%) range, while fewer than 10% achieve five-star status.

For Carson Valley Health, improving their Star Rating is a top priority. “A primary goal in 2025 will be to move into the five-star category,” Cruz.

By refining quality improvement strategies and leveraging proactive patient engagement initiatives, hospitals can improve CMS ratings while also advancing their overall patient safety strategy.

Patient Safety Strategy #4: Managing High-Cost Patient Populations to Improve Outcomes and Reduce Costs

Cheyenne Regional is also working to address the “high-dollar, high-cost patients,” Lima says. That includes focusing on high-cost diagnostic groups, such as those with heart failure and those undergoing chemotherapy.

Hospitals that prioritize high-cost patient populations can see multiple benefits, both in cost containment and patient outcomes. These patients often require frequent hospital visits, specialized treatments, and complex care coordination, which can strain hospital resources if not managed effectively. By identifying and addressing these groups proactively, hospitals can reduce avoidable hospitalizations, optimize resource allocation, and improve overall efficiency.

At Northwell Health in New York, the 21-hospital system has taken steps to stem costs by proactively addressing the “mental health crisis” that has been on the uptick since the COVID-19 pandemic, says Peter Silver, M.D., MBA, Senior Vice President and Chief Quality Officer with Northwell Health. “Hospitals are under increasing financial pressure,” Silver says. Northwell embarked on a multiyear initiative to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations and attendant costs by screening all ambulatory patients for depression.

To date, the health system has successfully screened some 2 million patients, Silver says. Northwell also places a heavy emphasis on disease management for highly prevalent conditions like hypertension and steers patients toward preventive services, such as colonography and mammography, that can identify diseases early and reduce downstream spending.

Focusing on high-cost patient management aligns with value-based care initiatives, which emphasize preventing complications and unnecessary admissions rather than just treating acute episodes. This approach can also enhance patient experience and satisfaction, as better coordination and targeted interventions often lead to fewer disruptions in care and improved quality of life.

By refining strategies for high-cost, high-risk patients, hospitals can balance financial sustainability with improved patient outcomes, reinforcing their overall patient safety strategy while maintaining compliance with performance-based reimbursement models.

Conclusion

In 2025, hospital leaders are embracing a dynamic, multifaceted patient safety strategy to navigate the evolving challenges of healthcare quality. From reducing readmissions and improving CMS Star Ratings to adopting new quality measures and managing high-cost patient populations, hospitals are refining their approaches to drive better outcomes and financial sustainability.

Yet, as Silver at Northwell Health emphasizes, there is no singular focus when it comes to quality and safety efforts. Instead, organizations must continuously adapt, minimize errors, and—most importantly—learn from them. By leveraging proactive strategies, data-driven insights, and collaborative leadership, hospitals can build a stronger, safer healthcare system that prioritizes both patient well-being and long-term success.

You may also like: 

Ambulatory Surgery Center

The Ultimate Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture Guide

A strong safety culture is critical for ambulatory surgery centers. The Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture provides leaders with insights to assess risks, improve communication, and enhance compliance. Learn how to implement this evidence-based tool for better patient outcomes.

Table of Contents

For ambulatory surgery centers, delivering high-quality, safe, and efficient care is a top priority. Unlike hospital settings, ASCs operate on a scheduled basis, allowing for streamlined workflows and predictable patient volumes. However, maintaining a robust safety culture requires proactive leadership, data-driven decision-making, and continuous improvement.

The Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture, developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), is designed to help ASCs measure staff perceptions of safety, teamwork, error prevention, and leadership effectiveness. By leveraging this tool, ASC executives can identify strengths, uncover vulnerabilities, and drive measurable improvements in safety and patient outcomes.

Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture

What Is the Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture?

The Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture, also known as the ASC SOPS, is a validated assessment tool designed to evaluate safety culture in outpatient surgical facilities. Unlike hospital-based patient safety culture surveys, this tool is tailored specifically for ASCs, where efficient workflows, clear communication, and leadership engagement are essential for optimal patient outcomes.

Key Focus Areas of the Survey:

  • Teamwork and communication across roles and departments
  • Staff perceptions of patient safety and willingness to report concerns
  • Leadership effectiveness in fostering a culture of safety
  • Incident reporting processes and follow-through on safety concerns
  • Staffing levels and their impact on patient care
  • Adherence to safety protocols and compliance with best practices

By analyzing survey results, ASC leaders gain valuable insights into their facility’s safety strengths and weaknesses, allowing them to implement targeted interventions for improvement.

Why Safety Culture Matters: The Evidence

A growing body of research highlights the direct link between a strong patient safety culture and improved healthcare outcomes. A December 2023 study, “Enhancing Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals,” published in Cureus, reviewed 47 separate articles—including systematic reviews and cross-sectional, qualitative, and descriptive studies—and found that hospitals with a well-established patient safety culture experience fewer medical errors and adverse events. The study concluded that prioritizing patient safety through structured programs and training can dramatically enhance healthcare quality, performance, and productivity.

Why the Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture Matters to Executive Leaders

1. Strengthening Patient Safety & Reducing Surgical Complications

A strong safety culture is directly linked to lower rates of surgical site infections (SSIs), procedural errors, and unplanned hospital transfers. By assessing safety culture, ASC leaders can:

  • Identify and address communication breakdowns.
  • Reduce preventable complications through evidence-based interventions.
  • Foster a proactive safety mindset among staff.

2. Meeting Regulatory & Accreditation Standards

ASCs must adhere to rigorous CMS, The Joint Commission (TJC), and Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) patient safety requirements. The AHRQ ASC Survey supports compliance with:

  • CMS Quality Reporting Program
  • ASC Accreditation Requirements (AAAHC, TJC, DNV)
  • State & Federal Patient Safety Regulations

By proactively addressing safety concerns identified in the survey, ASCs can avoid regulatory penalties and demonstrate their commitment to high-quality care.

3. Improving Staff Engagement & Retention

Turnover and staffing shortages remain challenges for ASCs. Employees who feel valued, heard, and supported in their safety efforts are more likely to stay engaged. A well-executed safety culture survey helps leaders:

  • Increase staff trust in leadership.
  • Improve reporting transparency and error prevention.
  • Reduce burnout by addressing workload concerns.

4. Benchmarking Against National Standards

By leveraging the AHRQ SOPS® Database, ASCs can compare their safety culture scores against national benchmarks. Understanding how your facility stacks up against industry peers provides clear direction for improvement and helps identify best practices from top-performing ASCs.

A Practical Roadmap for Leaders: How to Implement the Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture Survey

Step 1: Secure Leadership Buy-In & Define Objectives

Senior leadership support is crucial. Executives should articulate how the survey results will be used to drive real safety improvements, not just as a compliance checkbox.

Step 2: Encourage Broad Participation

To ensure an accurate assessment, encourage participation from all roles, including:

  • Surgeons
  • Anesthesia providers
  • Nurses
  • Technicians
  • Administrative staff

Step 3: Analyze the Data & Identify Trends

Avoid getting lost in data overload—focus on key insights:

  • Are certain departments reporting lower safety perceptions?
  • Do staff feel comfortable reporting errors?
  • Are there gaps in handoff communication?

Step 4: Develop & Implement Targeted Solutions

  • If communication is a challenge, implement structured handoff protocols. (See our guide Patient Handoff Templates: An Executive Guide to Safer Transitions.)
  • If error reporting is low, introduce a Just Culture framework to reduce fear of punitive actions.
  • If staffing concerns emerge, assess workload distribution and scheduling flexibility.

Step 5: Reassess Regularly & Track Progress

Safety culture improvement is an ongoing process. Re-administer the survey annually or biannually to measure progress and refine safety strategies.

Why Partnering with an Experienced SOPS Survey Provider Maximizes Your Results

Administering and analyzing the ASC Survey on Patient Safety Culture requires expertise. Partnering with a trusted external provider ensures:

1. Higher Response Rates & Data Accuracy

Experienced providers optimize survey distribution, anonymity, and participation, leading to more reliable insights.

2. Expert Data Interpretation & Benchmarking

Rather than just receiving raw data, ASC leaders get deep-dive analytics comparing their facility to national benchmarks.

3. Actionable Insights for Leadership Decision-Making

Survey partners provide customized reports, executive summaries, and can even present findings to senior leadership, making it easier for leaders to act on the data.

4. Faster Implementation & Continuous Improvement

By outsourcing survey administration, ASC leaders can focus on implementing improvements rather than managing data collection logistics.

Leveraging the ASC Survey on Patient Safety Culture for Long-Term Success

A data-driven approach to patient safety culture not only reduces errors but also strengthens your facility’s reputation and competitive positioning.

By implementing the Ambulatory Surgery Center Survey on Patient Safety Culture, your ASC can:

  • Improve patient outcomes and safety scores.
  • Enhance regulatory compliance & accreditation readiness.
  • Boost staff retention and workplace satisfaction.
  • Build a high-performance, safety-focused environment.

Get Expert Support for Your ASC’s Safety Culture

Take a proactive approach to ASC safety. Contact American Data Network today for a free consultation and discover how our SOPS® Survey services can streamline your assessment, provide critical benchmarks, and drive measurable improvements in patient care.

You may also like:

a doctor and nurse discussing a culture of safety in healthcare

Culture of Safety in Healthcare: Elevating Patient Outcomes and Trust

Cultivating a culture of safety in healthcare isn’t just about compliance—it’s about enhancing patient outcomes, building trust, and driving operational excellence. Learn how strategic leadership, open communication, and continuous improvement are revolutionizing the patient experience and solidifying trust in healthcare organizations. Ready to elevate your facility’s safety culture? Read on to learn the key strategies that make a difference.

Table of Contents

A culture of safety in healthcare is more than just a strategic priority on a roadmap; it’s a foundational element of high-quality patient care. When healthcare organizations prioritize safety, they see improvements not only in clinical outcomes but also in patient satisfaction, operational efficiency, and staff morale.

Yet, creating a culture of safety in healthcare requires more than policies and protocols—it demands a leadership-driven commitment to fostering an environment where safety is at the forefront of every decision, action, and communication.

Culture of Safety in Healthcare

Culture of Safety in Healthcare: Impact on Clinical Indicators and Reducing Adverse Events

One of the most significant benefits of a culture of safety in healthcare is its ability to reduce adverse events. By creating an environment that encourages transparent communication, continuous learning, and a proactive approach to risk management, healthcare organizations can achieve substantial improvements in clinical outcomes.

1. Reduction in Surgical Site Infections (SSIs)

A robust safety culture healthcare can significantly lower the incidence of SSIs. One recent study assessing the surgical outcomes at a group of community hospitals in Minnesota found a significant link between aspects of safety culture and decreased rates of surgical site infections (SSI) following colon surgery. In this study, researchers tracked the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture and National Healthcare Safety Network definitions and colon SSI rates. Ultimately, nine out of 12 dimensions of a patient safety culture “were significantly associated with lower colon SSI rates,” according to the study. (Fan et al., J Am Coll Surg, Feb. 2016)

Key safety culture dimensions linked to lower SSIs include:

  • Teamwork across and within units,
  • Organizational Learning,
  • Communication about Error,
  • Management Support for Patient Safety, and
  • Supervisor/Manager Expectations and Actions Promoting Safety, among others.

2. Reduction in Patient Falls

Patient falls are a common adverse event in healthcare settings, leading to increased morbidity, longer hospital stays, and higher costs. However, facilities that cultivate a culture of safety in healthcare see substantial reductions in fall rates. According to a 2023 study in the Journal of Clinical Nursing, units with a strong safety climate and collaborative teamwork—particularly between nurses, physicians, and pharmacists—reported fewer patient falls. (Alanzi et al., J Clin Nurse, Oct. 2023)

3. Decrease in Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs)

Additional research has added to the body of evidence tying a positive culture of safety to health outcomes:

Using Surveys to Strengthen a Culture of Safety in Healthcare

An effective way to measure and enhance a culture of safety in healthcare is through a Survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS). These surveys provide valuable insights into staff perceptions of safety practices, communication openness, and leadership support. Conducting regular SOPS assessments allows healthcare organizations to:

  • Identify strengths and areas for improvement in safety culture.
  • Measure the impact of safety initiatives on staff perceptions.
  • Benchmark performance against national standards for patient safety.

American Data Network offers an SOPS Service designed to help healthcare organizations administer, analyze, and act on the results of these surveys. By leveraging ADN’s expertise, hospitals can gain comprehensive analytics reports that drive targeted safety interventions and foster a culture of continuous improvement.

Enhancing Patient Experience with a Culture of Safety in Healthcare

A high-quality culture of safety in healthcare not only prevents adverse events but also enhances the overall patient experience. Patients who feel safe and secure are more likely to report positive experiences, leading to higher satisfaction scores and improved hospital reputations.

A study published in the Journal of Patient Safety explored the relationship between patient safety culture and patient experiences. Researchers found a significant positive correlation between high staff safety culture scores (using the Hospital SOPS tool) and high patient satisfaction scores (using the CAHPS Hospital Survey).

  • Facilities with a strong culture of safety received better ratings for communication, staff responsiveness, and overall patient care experience.
  • Twelve out of fifteen safety culture dimensions were positively linked to improved patient satisfaction scores, demonstrating that safety culture impacts every aspect of patient interactions.

These findings underscore the strategic advantage of prioritizing a culture of safety healthcare not only to improve clinical outcomes but also to foster positive patient relationships and enhance overall experiences.

Leadership’s Role in Building a Culture of Safety in Healthcare

Successful implementation of a culture of safety in healthcare hinges on leadership’s commitment to safety as a core organizational value. Leaders play a pivotal role by:

  • Setting Clear Expectations: Establishing safety as a non-negotiable priority for all staff levels.
  • Modeling Safety-First Behavior: Demonstrating accountability and transparency when addressing safety concerns.
  • Encouraging Open Communication: Creating a non-punitive environment where staff feel safe to report errors and near-misses without fear of retribution.
  • Investing in Continuous Learning: Supporting ongoing education and training initiatives to keep staff updated on best practices and emerging safety trends.

An annual perspective by the Patient Safety Network (PSNet) emphasized that leadership’s support and involvement are crucial for embedding a healthcare culture of safety across all organizational layers. (PSNet Annual Perspective, March 2024)

Conclusion: Why a Culture of Safety in Healthcare is a Strategic Imperative

A culture of safety in healthcare is not just about compliance or reducing adverse events; it is about creating an environment where patients feel secure, staff feel supported, and clinical outcomes are optimized. Healthcare leaders who prioritize safety culture healthcare:

  • Build Trust: Patients are more likely to trust and recommend facilities known for their safety commitment.
  • Boost Financial Performance: By reducing adverse events and hospital-acquired infections, facilities save on costs associated with readmissions, extended stays, and legal claims.
  • Enhance Organizational Reputation: A strong safety culture reinforces a facility’s reputation as a leader in patient-centered care.

As healthcare organizations navigate an increasingly complex landscape, investing in a culture of safety in healthcare is a strategic imperative for sustainable success. Facilities that champion safety as a core value will not only improve patient outcomes but also achieve long-term operational excellence.

You may also like:

nursing home survey on patient safety culture

Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture: Elevating Resident Care and Outcomes

Discover how the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture can revolutionize your approach to resident safety and quality improvement. Learn why forward-thinking leaders are embracing this tool to benchmark performance, strengthen teamwork, and proactively address challenges unique to long-term care environments. Don’t miss the strategic insights and actionable guidance that can help your organization stand out as a patient safety leader.

7 min read

Table of Contents

As a leader tasked with ensuring resident safety in a nursing home setting, your responsibilities extend beyond meeting regulatory requirements. You must cultivate a proactive, resident-centered environment where continuous quality improvement is woven into daily operations. One powerful yet often underutilized resource available to you is the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture, developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 

Focusing on patient safety culture (PSC) isn’t just a best practice—it’s a proven catalyst for better outcomes. A March 2023 scoping review, “The association between patient safety culture and adverse events,” found that in more than three-quarters (76%) of the studies evaluated, higher PSC scores were linked to lower rates of adverse events. In other words, strengthening your internal safety climate can directly correlate with preventing harm and improving the quality of resident care.

By harnessing insights from the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture, you can align leadership strategies with frontline realities, boost staff engagement, and craft targeted interventions that reduce errors and enhance care delivery. Whether it’s refining your strategic planning, optimizing staff training, reallocating resources, or adjusting policies, this evidence-based tool provides the data-driven guidance you need to transform intention into meaningful action.

In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore how the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture works, why it matters to executive-level decision-makers, and how to integrate its findings seamlessly into your strategic initiatives and quality improvement efforts.

Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture

What Is the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture?

The Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture offers a structured way to understand the human factors affecting resident safety in long-term care settings. Unlike generic surveys, it zeroes in on the unique environment of nursing homes, addressing challenges such as staff turnover, communication during shift changes, adherence to care plans, and management of chronic conditions.

Key Focus Areas of the Survey Include:

  • Teamwork and staff collaboration
  • Communication openness and information exchange
  • Response to mistakes and non-punitive error reporting
  • Staffing levels, training, and workload management
  • Leadership support and organizational learning

By examining these areas, you gain data-driven insights into how your frontline teams perceive safety and identify where to implement targeted improvements for better resident outcomes.

Access the Full Survey Here: AHRQ Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture (PDF)

Why the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture Matters to Executive Leaders

1. Aligning Strategic Goals With Day-to-Day Reality

Broad metrics like regulatory compliance reports and satisfaction scores provide a snapshot of performance but don’t fully illuminate why certain issues persist. This survey allows you to identify underlying cultural barriers—such as fear of speaking up or inconsistent handoff communication—that influence safety and quality. Understanding these dynamics helps align your strategic initiatives with the frontline experiences that shape resident outcomes.

2. Supporting Value-Based Care in Long-Term Settings

As reimbursement models evolve, demonstrating a strong safety culture is critical. Insights from the survey can inform resource allocation, training programs, and policy changes that address root causes of adverse events. By tackling these issues proactively, you enhance resident care quality and position your nursing home favorably within value-based payment frameworks.

3. Enhancing Staff Engagement, Retention, and Morale

Turnover and staffing challenges are persistent concerns in nursing homes. Using this survey to highlight and improve workplace conditions, teamwork, and communication can help staff feel valued, heard, and empowered. This leads to higher retention rates, a more stable workforce, and ultimately, more consistent, compassionate care for residents.

4. Benchmarking Against National Standards

Because AHRQ’s survey is widely recognized, you can benchmark your results against national averages. Knowing where your nursing home stands relative to peers helps you measure the effectiveness of your initiatives and identify best practices from top-performing institutions.

Implementing the Survey: A Practical Roadmap for Leaders

Step 1: Secure Leadership Buy-In and Define Objectives

Your endorsement is vital. Communicate the survey’s value to your executive team and department heads. Clarify how the results will guide policy updates, training investments, and quality improvement efforts. Establish concrete goals, such as improving staff perceptions of communication clarity or reducing misunderstandings during shift changes.

Step 2: Encourage Broad Participation

For an accurate picture, invite input from all roles—nurses, aides, therapists, housekeeping, and administrative staff. Emphasize confidentiality and fairness, ensuring staff understand that honest feedback leads to improvement, not punitive measures.

Step 3: Analyze and Interpret Results in Context

Go beyond raw scores. Look for patterns that reveal root causes. For example, if certain shifts report lower trust in management support, investigate communication methods, staffing levels, or training gaps that may be influencing perceptions.

Step 4: Engage Interdisciplinary Teams in Improvement

Once key areas for improvement emerge, assemble a diverse team to propose solutions. Including representatives from various roles ensures that recommended changes are practical, feasible, and more likely to gain acceptance at all levels.

Step 5: Tailor Training, Policies, and Systems

If the survey highlights inconsistent adherence to care plans, consider implementing more robust staff education or digital tools for care coordination. If staff fear reporting mistakes, invest in training on just culture principles, making it clear that learning from errors, not assigning blame, is your organizational standard.

Step 6: Communicate Progress and Reassess Regularly

Transparency is key. Share improvement milestones with all staff, celebrating wins and acknowledging challenges. Periodically re-administer the survey (annually or biannually) to track your progress, keep the momentum going, and continuously refine your patient safety culture strategy.

How Partnering with an Experienced SOPS Survey Provider Maximizes Your Results

Administering the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture on your own can be time-consuming and complex. Partnering with an experienced external provider can simplify the process, ensure high-quality data, and offer expert insights that drive meaningful changes.

1. Smooth SOPS Survey Administration

A seasoned partner handles logistics—distributing surveys, ensuring anonymity, and providing engagement resources—so your staff can focus on care. This typically increases response rates and data reliability.

2. Expert Analysis and Benchmarking

Experienced providers bring domain expertise and comparative data sets. They help interpret results, highlight what’s significant, and pinpoint where your nursing home stands relative to similar facilities nationwide.

3. Clear Reporting and Actionable Guidance

Turning data into strategy can be daunting. A partner transforms survey results into comprehensible reports and dashboards, helping you quickly identify priorities. They’ll also provide best-practice recommendations for improvement, accelerating your ability to implement effective interventions.

4. Sustained Focus on Strategic Decision-Making

By outsourcing survey administration and analysis, you free up leadership time. Instead of wrestling with data logistics, you can devote energy to setting strategic goals, making informed decisions, and overseeing long-term improvements in resident safety.

Leveraging the Survey Data for Long-Term Organizational Growth

A robust patient safety culture is the foundation for delivering exceptional, person-centered care in a nursing home setting. By using the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture as a strategic tool, you:

  • Build a High-Performing, Resident-Centered Environment: Engaged staff and proactive leadership jointly create safer, more responsive care delivery.
  • Improve Regulatory Compliance and Accreditation: A strong safety culture supports meeting standards set by The Joint Commission, CMS, and other regulatory bodies.
  • Enhance Reputation and Competitive Edge: Nursing homes known for their safety culture and compassionate care attract both residents and high-quality staff, strengthening your market position.

Final Thoughts

As a senior leader committed to advancing resident safety and quality in a nursing home environment, the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture provides a clear, data-driven path. When leveraged thoughtfully, it becomes an essential catalyst for continuous improvement—illuminating frontline realities, guiding strategic investments, and fostering a culture of trust, collaboration, and ongoing learning.

Ready to Get Started?

Don’t wait for regulatory pressures or adverse events to prompt action. Take a proactive step in enhancing your safety culture today. Contact American Data Network to learn how our SOPS Survey services can streamline your assessment process, provide valuable benchmarks, and guide you toward sustainable, lasting improvements that truly elevate the quality of care in your nursing home.

You may also like:

Team of doctors discussing a patient safety dashboard

National Healthcare Safety Dashboard: A New Tool to Protect Patient Safety

The National Healthcare Safety Dashboard is a groundbreaking tool empowering hospital leaders with real-time insights into patient safety data. By aggregating crucial metrics from AHRQ and CMS, it enables hospitals to benchmark performance and enhance patient safety outcomes. Learn how this innovative dashboard drives harm reduction and supports national safety goals, positioning hospitals at the forefront of patient safety excellence.

6 min read

Table of Contents

Hospital leaders, compliance directors, and institutional safety advocates now have a powerful patient safety dashboard at their fingertips. The innovative National Healthcare Safety Dashboard serves as a robust hospital patient safety dashboard designed to assess, analyze, and improve hospital safety data. Developed through the collaboration of federal agencies and private partners, this dashboard will help hospitals benchmark their performance against the current state of patient and workforce safety.

Background on the Patient Safety Dashboard

Launched in December 2024, the National Healthcare Safety Dashboard is a comprehensive tool that focuses on some of the most consequential hospital safety data metrics impacting patient safety nationwide. By aggregating data from four key sources, this hospital patient safety dashboard provides granular details on specific safety events, clinical indicators, and patient survey responses across four broad categories.

Three of the four dashboard categories are sourced from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the other one comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The four data sources include:

  • Hospital Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ).
  • Hospital Medicare Adverse Events (AHRQ).
  • Hospital Reporting Program Safety Measures (CMS).
  • Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) Hospital Survey (AHRQ).

While the patient safety dashboard currently focuses on hospital-based metrics, AHRQ officials have indicated plans to expand its scope to ambulatory settings and nursing homes. This hospital patient safety dashboard is a creation of the National Action Alliance for Patient and Workforce Safety (NAA), a collective of federal agencies and private partners formed within AHRQ in 2023 that seeks to meet the stated goals of AHRQ’s National Advisory Council to reduce patient and workforce harm by 50% by 2026.

The NAA supports five primary tactics to meet national goals in reducing patient safety adverse events and “help all healthcare systems strengthen their patient and workforce safety outcomes.” The five aims include:

  • Conducting self-safety assessments to assess a baseline measure of performance.
  • Empowering patient feedback to steer strategic aims (e.g., allowing patients’ safety concerns to flow into facilities’ event reporting systems).
  • Redesigning the workplace and team units to support workforce safety.
  • Strengthening the training of all workforce members in safety competencies.
  • Promoting research, learning, and process-sharing (e.g., harm reduction strategies) across networks.

The hospital safety data aggregated by the NAA is essential for tracking progress and measuring improvements in Adverse Events in Hospitals and other key indicators. “The National Healthcare Safety Dashboard is one approach to tracking our progress on patient and workforce safety nationally using measures prioritized by national programs,” the NAA states.

A Closer Look at the Data

Each of the four key data sources that comprise this patient safety dashboard contains sub-elements that delve into the latest national measures – providing a benchmark that facilities can use as they start on, or continue, their journey to enhanced harm reduction. In all cases, the charts and tables present the latest available federal data. The following section provides a closer look at the primary data categories and their sub-elements.

Hospital Patient Safety Indicators

This category includes more than a dozen condition- or event-related safety indicators, as follows:

  • Death rate in low-mortality diagnosis related groups (DRGs) (PSI-02)
  • Pressure ulcer rate (PSI-03)
  • Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate (PSI-06)
  • Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection rate (PSI-07)
  • In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate (PSI-08)
  • Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate (PSI-09)
  • Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate (PSI-10)
  • Postoperative respiratory failure rate (PSI-11)
  • Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate (PSI-12)
  • Postoperative sepsis rate (PSI-13)
  • Postoperative wound dehiscence rate (PSI-14)
  • Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate (PSI-15)
  • Birth trauma rate – injury to neonate (PSI-17)

If you navigate through the data sets, you’ll find overall risk stratification levels for the various safety indicators. For instance, the post-operative sepsis rate shows a rolling national risk level from the period between 2016 and 2021, during which time facilities saw a significant reduction in post-op sepsis rates, decreasing from five cases per 1,000 discharges to about three-and-a-half cases per 1,000. Users can also mine the data further, stratifying the data based on patient variables (e.g., age group, expected payer, patient sex).

Facilities like ADN’s clients using the Clinical Benchmarking System have access to this type of benchmarking data already.

Hospital patient safety indicators

Hospital Medicare Adverse Events

One of the briefer data sets on the Safety Dashboard, the adverse events page shows two levels of stratification: patients with at least one adverse event during hospitalization; and total adverse events per 1,000 discharges. In both cases, the number of events showed favorable progress between 2021 and 2022, the latest year of available data. The cumulative number of adverse events per 1,000 discharges, for instance, fell from about 83.6 to 71.1.

Adverse events were identified using AHRQ’s Quality and Safety Review System (QSRS) to abstract information from hospital records. Measures include composite adverse event rates.

Hospital Medicare adverse events (QSRS program)

CMS Hospital Reporting Program Safety Measures

The safety performance data segment of the dashboard contains seven sub-elements, from hospital-associated infections to surgical site infections and complications. This portion of the dashboard contains some of the most recent data available, ending in calendar year 2024. The full list covers:

  • Central-line associated bloodstream infections: Intensive care unit plus select wards (HAI-1)
  • Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: ICU only (HAI-2)
  • Surgical site infection: Colon surgery (HAI-3)
  • Surgical site infection: Abdominal hysterectomy (HAI-4)
  • Death for surgical inpatient with serious treatable complications (PSI-04)
  • Complications for hip/knee replacements (COMP-HIP-KNEE)
  • Appropriate care for severe sepsis/septic shock (SEP-1)

Safety measures from CMS hospital reporting programs

Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) Hospital Survey

Based on the SOPS data tool, the dashboard’s survey-based data covers 11 composite measures, and compares survey results year-over-year. The SOPS tool assesses “provider and staff perceptions of patient safety culture.” Within the dashboard, the covered measures include:

  • Communication about error.
  • Communication openness.
  • Handoffs and information exchange.
  • Hospital management support for patient safety.
  • Organizational learning – continuous improvement.
  • Reporting patient safety events.
  • Response to error.
  • Staffing and workplace.
  • Supervisor, manager or clinical leader support for patient safety.
  • Teamwork.
  • Unit/work area patient safety rating.

Hospital patient safety culture survey

Managing SOPS More Efficiently

To help hospitals manage SOPS data more effectively, ADN offers a dedicated Survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) Service. This service simplifies the process of gathering and analyzing SOPS data by providing clear, consistent methods for collecting staff feedback and generating detailed reports. Using ADN’s SOPS Service enables hospitals to better understand their patient safety culture and systematically identify areas for improvement.

Self-Assessment: A Place to Start

As part of the NAA’s efforts, the workgroup recommends that all healthcare systems committed to improving safety for patients (and workforce) begin with a self-assessment. The NAA directs hospital leaders to the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s (IHI) downloadable self-assessment tools (also available as an online tool).

The updated 2024 version of the IHI’s self-assessment tool aligns with national frameworks, including those of the NAA, CMS’ National Quality Strategy and others. The self-assessment is offered for individual evaluations or broader, team-based assessments, and both versions are available at the IHI website.

As the NAA’s Safety Dashboard gains traction and grows in the coming years, hospital leaders can turn to the data deposits to discern national trends and their organization’s status in the ongoing quest for enhanced safety.

doctor explaining patient handoff template

Patient Handoff Templates: An Executive Guide to Safer Transitions

Poor patient handoffs are a silent risk to healthcare quality, often leading to preventable errors, prolonged stays, and costly consequences. This guide for executives dives into proven handoff strategies like I-PASS and SBAR, showing how hospital leaders can streamline transitions of care and improve outcomes. Learn how ADN’s patient safety event reporting application can help track handoff-related issues and drive meaningful improvements across your organization.

12 min read

Table of Contents

Hospital executives nationwide are continually searching for ways to enhance quality improvement in healthcare. One key area often overlooked—but crucial to mitigating patient handoff errors—is the standardized patient handoff process. By refining patient handoff communication, healthcare leaders can strengthen patient safety, support staff efficiency, and improve overall organizational performance.

What Is a Patient Handoff and Why It Matters to Executives

Patient handoffs in patient care—sometimes referred to as “handovers”—involve transferring key information about a patient’s medical status, ongoing treatments, and relevant clinical details from one healthcare provider or team to another. These transitions occur frequently:

  • Shift changes between nursing or physician teams
  • Inter-departmental moves (e.g., from ICU to step-down units)
  • Inter-facility transfers (e.g., from a rural hospital to a tertiary care center)

Key Stat: The Joint Commission estimates that miscommunication during care transitions is a leading contributor to patient safety events—including preventable harm and higher readmission rates. “Joint Commission data indicate inadequate handovers are a factor in 80% of all adverse events, which include wrong-site, wrong-procedure, or wrong-patient surgeries; treatment delays; medication errors; and falls,” according to a 2018 study on communication’s effect on patient safety.

For hospital directors and VPs, these errors directly impact metrics such as patient satisfaction (HCAHPS scores), value-based reimbursement, and accreditation readiness.

How Patient Handoff Errors Affect Hospitals

When a patient handoff fails—due to incomplete, untimely, or misinterpreted information—the potential harm ranges from minor complications to serious sentinel events. This risk multiplies with the high frequency of handoffs in patient care.

  • Financial Impact: Medical errors and extended lengths of stay can lead to increased costs and reduced reimbursements.
  • Accreditation and Legal Risks: Agencies like The Joint Commission may cite communication lapses in accreditation reviews, and litigation risks rise when errors occur.
  • Reputation and Patient Satisfaction: Communication failures undermine patient trust and often negatively influence HCAHPS scores.

“Patient handoffs involve a structured communication process where the receiving caregiver ideally has the opportunity to ask questions and clarify details to fully understand the patient’s condition,” said Elizabeth Mort, MD, vice president and chief medical officer at The Joint Commission. “Healthcare professionals are deeply committed and work to ensure that patients’ needs are met, and optimal care is delivered. Regrettably, some of the important clinical detail can be lost during the transfer or transition of a patient to another healthcare provider for ongoing care.”

The Joint Commission suggests hospitals choose the patient handoff template that best fits their environment, but it emphasizes staff training, complete documentation, and cultural competency to prevent handoff communication breakdowns.

I-PASS vs. SBAR: Selecting a Patient Handoff Template

I-PASS: A Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Framework

I-PASS is a validated patient handoff tool designed to reduce medical errors and improve communication across multiple points of care. It was developed through a multi-institutional collaboration that sought to unify best practices from leading academic medical centers.

The acronym I-PASS stands for:

  1. Illness Severity:
    Providers categorize the patient’s current status (e.g., stable, unstable, or requiring close monitoring) to quickly convey the level of urgency.
  2. Patient Summary:
    A concise overview of the patient’s chief complaint, diagnosis, and brief hospital course. This may include relevant medical history and any major interventions already performed.
  3. Action List:
    Specific tasks to be completed by the incoming caregiver—such as ordering tests, following up on lab results, or administering medications. Clear accountability prevents important to-dos from being overlooked.
  4. Situation Awareness/Contingency Planning:
    Potential issues to watch out for and predefined plans to address them (e.g., “If the patient spikes a fever, initiate a sepsis workup”). Proactively sharing “what-ifs” helps avoid delays when complications arise.
  5. Synthesis by Receiver:
    The handoff recipient paraphrases the information and clarifies any uncertainties. This “teach-back” step ensures mutual understanding and encourages collaborative problem-solving.

Why It Works:

  • Evidence-Based: Multiple peer-reviewed studies show that adopting I-PASS can significantly reduce preventable errors, particularly in high-turnover environments like teaching hospitals.
  • Structured and Specific: Each element of I-PASS addresses a unique piece of critical information, preventing important details from slipping through the cracks.
  • Interdisciplinary: It’s adaptable for various roles—physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals—allowing everyone to speak a common “language” during handoffs.

SBAR: A Streamlined, Universal Approach

Originally adapted from the U.S. Navy’s communication protocols, SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) is another widely recognized framework for patient handoff communication. Its simplicity has made it a go-to method in many hospitals worldwide.

The acronym SBAR stands for:

  1. Situation:
    A succinct statement of the patient’s current condition or the immediate problem (e.g., “Mr. Smith’s oxygen saturation is dropping”).
  2. Background:
    Relevant medical history, recent interventions, or any contextual information that might influence treatment decisions (e.g., “He has a history of COPD and was admitted for pneumonia”).
  3. Assessment:
    The outgoing caregiver’s clinical interpretation—what they believe is happening based on vitals, labs, and observed symptoms (e.g., “I suspect his infection may be worsening due to increasing respiratory distress”).
  4. Recommendation:
    Proposed next steps or desired actions from the receiving team (e.g., “We should obtain an arterial blood gas and consider IV antibiotics immediately”).

Why It Works:

  • Concise and Flexible: SBAR’s four-step format is quick to learn and easy to remember, which is vital in urgent or fast-paced situations.
  • Improves Accuracy: By requiring an explicit “Assessment” and “Recommendation,” SBAR encourages providers to form and share a clinical impression rather than simply relay data.
  • Adaptable Across Departments: From emergency departments to perioperative settings, SBAR can be integrated into almost any workflow to facilitate clear communication.

Choosing Between I-PASS and SBAR

Both I-PASS and SBAR promote standardized patient handoff practices, reduce errors, and improve team collaboration. However, certain hospital environments may favor one approach over the other:

  • I-PASS is often preferred in academic or teaching hospitals where detailed action lists and contingency plans are critical. Its structured “Synthesis by Receiver” step can be especially beneficial in multidisciplinary teaching rounds or complex inpatient settings.
  • SBAR is widely adopted in fast-paced clinical areas—like the ER or ICU—because its four-step design quickly orients the receiver to the most urgent and relevant facts. It is also highly effective for nurse-to-physician communication when immediate clinical decisions are required.

Integrating I-PASS or SBAR Into Your Organization

  1. Policy and Procedure Development
    Write clear policies outlining which model to use (I-PASS or SBAR), in which situations, and who’s responsible.
    – Provide patient handoff examples during training sessions to illustrate correct usage.
  2. EHR Integration
    – Customize existing EHR templates to include fields for I-PASS or SBAR.
    – Ensure that patient handoff checklists are easy to locate and fill out, reducing the likelihood of missing key data.
  3. Ongoing Training and Auditing
    – Offer competency-based workshops and simulations for clinical staff.
    – Conduct regular audits to confirm thorough handoffs and gather feedback for continuous improvement.
  4. Measure Impact on Patient Safety and Outcomes
    – Track patient handoff errors and near-misses in your patient safety event reporting application before and after implementation.
    – Monitor patient satisfaction, staff satisfaction, and any relevant outcome metrics (e.g., falls, medication errors, readmission rates).

Handoffs and Event Reporting: Capturing Near Misses, Incidents, and Driving Process Improvement

Fostering a Just Culture Through Reporting:

Voluntary reporting is a primary method of event detection, which means frontline staff are the main source of information, making it possible to learn about fractured or flawed processes. They provide a unique perspective into everyday workflows that help uncover issues that may otherwise go unnoticed. Furthermore, an organization’s willingness to use these reports to learn from errors and implement changes that prevent future risk and harm are at the heart of a strong safety culture.

Encouraging staff to report near misses and incidents related to handoffs in your event reporting application creates an environment where reporting errors is viewed as an opportunity for learning rather than blame. This approach supports a patient safety culture by:

  • Encouraging Transparent Reporting: When staff are assured that handoff-related issues can be reported without punitive repercussions, they are more likely to share near misses and actual errors.
  • Empowering Frontline Staff: A culture that values open communication and learning helps team members feel more engaged and responsible for patient safety.
  • Building Trust: Transparent handling of handoff events reinforces trust among clinicians, ultimately leading to more accurate and complete communication during transitions of care.

Capturing Handoff Near Misses and Failures:

Patient handoffs are a critical point in transitions of care where communication gaps can lead to errors. When these lapses occur—even as near misses or “good catches”—they provide invaluable data for improving patient safety. By integrating a standardized handoff template into your clinical workflow, hospitals can:

  • Document Critical Details: Capture the who, what, when, where, and why immediately following an event through a structured Summary of Initial Report (SIR) in your event reporting application.
  • Identify Trends: Utilize data from near misses and failures to recognize recurring issues, such as incomplete or untimely communication. If your event reporting application has dashboards that can be easily filtered, this is much easier.
  • Facilitate Immediate Action: Trigger rapid response protocols by flagging high-risk handoff events, ensuring that remedial measures are enacted without delay.

Using Event Data to Drive Handoff Process Improvement:

Event reporting systems should be much more than repositories for data. They are powerful tools for continuous quality improvement. By systematically analyzing reported events related to handoffs, healthcare leaders can:

  • Benchmark Performance: Compare incident rates before and after the implementation of a standardized handoff template (such as I-PASS or SBAR).
  • Refine Protocols: Use actionable insights from event data to optimize handoff processes, ensuring that every communication contains all critical patient details.
  • Close the Loop: Implement feedback mechanisms where frontline staff are informed about changes made in response to their reports, thereby fostering a cycle of continuous improvement and increased engagement.

Integrating these practices ultimately drives better patient outcomes by reducing preventable errors and enhancing overall care coordination.

Patient Handoff Examples: 8 Tips for High Quality Handoffs

The Joint Commission created an infographic to help facilities implement better handoff practices. Download the patient handoff example infographic here.

TJC Patient Handoff Example

The Role of Communication Bias in Patient Handoff Examples

Studies in JAMA Network Open and JAMA Pediatrics show how language bias during handoffs can lead to decreased empathy and even inaccurate recall of vital clinical details. When shifts in perception or hidden biases accumulate, patient care quality suffers.

In December 2024, a study published in JAMA Network Open revealed that when clinicians hear others describe a patient using negatively biased language—such as scorn, skepticism, or stereotyped-based assumptions—they have less empathy toward that individual.

Sometimes clinicians even become less accurate in recalling the person’s critical health details, including lab results, symptoms to pay attention to overnight, or recommended treatments. While such shifts in perception may be subtle and unintentional in many cases, as these hidden biases accumulate, they can influence the care that patients ultimately receive, the study’s authors pointed out.

“Biased language comes from our own implicit biases but can also affect others who do not necessarily hold the same biases,” said lead author Austin Wesevich, MD, MPH, MS, a hematologist and health services researcher at the University of Chicago Medicine. “When talking about a patient behind closed doors, it is important that doctors consider the impact the words they choose may have on other clinicians.”

Executive Perspective: Training staff to use neutral, fact-based language during handoffs and patient safety efforts can lower the risk of discrimination and improve care consistency—both of which align with accreditation standards and community trust.

Executive-Level Strategies for Success

  1. Align With Organizational Goals
    Highlight ROI: Show how improved patient handoff communication reduces falls, lowers liability, and raises patient satisfaction (HCAHPS).
    Set Clear Metrics: Define how many communication-related safety events or falls occur before and after implementing new protocols.
  2. Adopt a Standardized Patient Handoff Tool
    I-PASS or SBAR Patient Handoff Example: Select a model that fits your facility’s culture.
    Integrate With EHR: Ensure that patient handoff templates are built into existing clinical workflows to minimize fragmented documentation.
  3. Ongoing Education and Skill-Building
    Regular Training: Offer simulated patient handoff examples, focusing on real-world scenarios like early-morning falls.
    Peer Feedback: Encourage nurses, physicians, and ancillary staff to constructively critique one another’s handoffs.
  4. Continuous Auditing and Improvement
    Establish KPIs: Track near-misses, sentinel events, and staff-reported handoff issues to measure progress.
    Conduct Random Spot-Checks: Validate the completeness of the patient handoff checklist.
    Adjust Rapidly: Use small tests of change (e.g., PDSA cycles) to refine handoff protocols.
  5. Foster a Bias-Aware Environment
    Implicit Bias Training: Emphasize neutral, patient-focused language.
    Create a Safe Reporting Culture: Staff must feel comfortable reporting handoff gaps—like failing to note fall risks—without fear of punitive action.

Conclusion: Elevating Patient Safety and Reducing Costly Errors

For hospital directors and VPs, optimizing patient handoff communication is a strategic imperative. Standardized handoffs minimize patient handoff errors, enhance staff efficiency, and reduce preventable events—including serious patient falls at shift change. By adopting a structured approach, providing robust training, monitoring performance, and addressing bias, healthcare leaders can create a safer, more equitable environment that raises patient satisfaction and lowers organizational risk.

Next Steps

  • Assess your current handoff protocols for gaps during shift changes.
  • Implement a standardized model (e.g., I-PASS or SBAR), with emphasis on fall-risk communication.
  • Track improvements in fall rates, safety incidents, and patient satisfaction over the next 6–12 months.
  • Refine the process using feedback loops, technology integration, and ongoing education.

By prioritizing structured, consistent patient handoffs, hospitals can protect both patient safety and the bottom line—demonstrating tangible leadership in quality care.